Lachlan Harris and Andrew Charlton say major party candidates are becoming more extreme. But do the data support their claims?
After a horrible decade or so, America’s unemployment rate is finally back down to around 4%, in the vicinity of what would normally be considered ‘full employment’. But is there still some slack in the US labour market? The Economic Policy Institute thinks so, and Josh Bivens at EPI has produced this graph to support their argument: If the number of employed people rises, those extra workers can come from one of two places. Either the new workers were previously actively looking for a job, in which case they were “unemployed”, or they were out of work and not actively looking for a job, in which case they’re considered to have been “not in the labour force.” The EPI chart shows that in recent months, over 70% of newly employed people have come from the ranks of those who were not in the labour force – the people who were out of work, but not actively looking for a job.
Have you ever wondered how your income compares to other Australians? Well use this calculator thing I made to look it up then. It takes your household’s after-tax income and adjusts it for the number of people in your house to give your ‘equivalised disposable household income.’ The calculator uses ABS data from 2015-16, which was released in September 2017. Note: due to a large influx of traffic, the calculator is only working intermittently, and it’s working slowly when it is working. Thanks for your interest, it will be fixed as soon as possible. You can get the ABS data here.
What’s happened to wages for men and women in each industry?
Does the theory hold up?
I try to improve on an FT graph.
This blog is new!